The institution
identifies, evaluates, and publishes goals and outcomes for student achievement
appropriate to the institution’s mission, the nature of the students it serves,
and the kinds of programs offered. The institution uses multiple measures to
document student success.
x
Compliance o Non-Compliance o Partial Compliance
The University of
Louisiana at Lafayette recognizes the importance of identifying, evaluating,
and publishing goals and outcomes related to student achievement. Student
success is recorded and documented in a variety of formats for different
metrics. The Strategic
Plan 2015-2020 and
the Louisiana Performance Accountability
System (LAPAS) provide
student success goals and specific targets. The University’s input into both
Strategic Plan and LAPAS student achievement goals and targets informs ongoing
assessment of achievement outcomes for the colleges and programs.
UL Lafayette publishes goals and outcomes for student achievement
on its Student Success webpage (https://studentsuccess.louisiana.edu/node/570).
In its efforts to
assess student achievement, the University records, examines, and publishes
student achievement data for enrollment, retention, and graduation of both
undergraduate and graduate students through LAPAS, the public-facing module for
Louisiana Board of Regents (BOR) reporting. Student achievement measures
embedded in LAPAS reports form the foundational information used to assess the
extent to which students within the colleges and their programs are attaining
the targets established. Targets were set through the University’s strategic
planning process or to establish state-level targets. Both processes involved University
personnel determining appropriate targets, thresholds, and/or benchmarks for
the identified achievement measures presented below. Targets/benchmarks were
generally established based on analysis of historical data and by approximating
reasonable future goals that were achievable and could be disaggregated to the
program level.
From FY2015
through FY2017, the enrollment goal was to “increase the Fall 14th
class day headcount enrollment in public postsecondary education by 3.9% from
the baseline level of 16,361 in Fall 2009 to 17,000 by Fall 2018.” Through
LAPAS Objective One, enrollment for the preceding academic year is reported in
the following Fiscal Year. In Fall 2014, the
14th class day headcount was 17,195 students, which surpassed the
goal set to have enrollment at 17,000 students by Fall 2018. This trend would
continue every year, including FY2016 with
17,508 students and FY2017 with 17,519 students.
In FY2018, the
LAPAS reporting structure changed, and the University consequently identified
new goals. The BOR changed the
enrollment reporting date from the 14th day of classes to the last
day of the Fall semester preceding the Fiscal Year. For FY2018, the Fall 2017
enrollment was 17,511 students. This number of students may be lower than that
reported on the 14th class day as students may have withdrawn after
the 14th class day. In FY2018, UL Lafayette established the
objective in LAPAS to “increase the Fall headcount enrollment by 1.5% from the
baseline level of 17,837 in Fall 2015 to 18,105 by Fall 2020.” This goal is
aligned with the Strategic Plan 2015-2020
(SI 1-KPI 1) enrollment goals. Table 8.1 – 1 shows the number of
students enrolled on the 14th class day for FY2015-FY2018.
Table 8.1 – 1: Number of Students Enrolled on 14th
Class Day
Fiscal
Year |
Actual
Enrollment |
Percent
Variance from Target Enrollment Goal |
FY2015 |
17,195 |
1.37% |
FY2016 |
17,508 |
2.91% |
FY2017 |
17,519 |
4.90% |
FY2018 |
17,511** |
4.23% |
**Enrollment was recorded at the end
of Fall 2018 Semester
For FY2015,
FY2016, FY2017, and FY2018, the University defined retention targets for
first-time, full-time, and degree-seeking students as illustrated in the LAPAS
documents above. The original objectives were based on a final year of FY2018,
and the targets for FY2016-2018 remained the same: 78 percent
first-to-second-year retention, and 65 percent first-to-third-year retention.
In FY2018, the objectives were modified, and new targets were established. Table
8.1 – 2 shows these retention numbers.
Table 8.1 – 2: First-time in College,
Full-time, Degree-seeking Students
|
FY2015 |
FY2016 |
FY2017 |
FY2018 (modified objectives) |
||||||||
|
|
Goal |
Cohort Retained |
|
Goal |
Cohort Retained |
|
Goal |
Cohort Retained |
|
Goal |
Cohort Retained |
1st-2nd year |
FALL 13-14 |
77.5% |
76.3% |
FALL 14-15 |
78% |
76% |
FALL 15-16 |
78% |
74.4% |
FALL 16-17 |
78% |
75% |
1st-3rd year |
FALL 12-14 |
64.5% |
62.4% |
FALL 13-15 |
65% |
64.2% |
FALL 14-16 |
65% |
64.1% |
FALL 15-17 |
65% |
62.1% |
Objective Two in
LAPAS for first-to-second-year retention in FY2015-2017 was to “increase the
percentage of first-time college, full-time, degree-seeking students retained
to the second Fall at the same institution of initial enrollment by 2.1
percentage points from the Fall 2008 cohort (to Fall 2009) baseline level of
75.9% to 78%.” In Objective Three for FY2015-2017, the objective for
first-to-third-year retention of students was to “increase the percentage of
first-time in college, full-time, degree-seeking students retained to the third
Fall at the same institution of initial enrollment by 2.6 percentage points
from the Fall 2007 cohort (to Fall 2009) baseline level of 62.4% to 65%.” The
cohorts change based on the FY being reported in LAPAS. These objectives formed
the targets towards which the University worked.
This reporting
cycle is the first to have the modified objectives in LAPAS. The objective for
first-to-second-year retention states, “increase the percentage of first-time
in college, full-time, degree-seeking students retained to the second Fall at
the same institution of initial enrollment by one percentage point from the
Fall 2014 cohort (to Fall 2015) baseline level of 76% to 77%.” For
first-to-third-year retention the objective states, “increase the percentage of
first-time in college, full-time, degree-seeking students retained to the third
Fall at the same four-year institution of initial enrollment by 0.3 percentage
points from the Fall 2013 cohort (to Fall 2015) baseline level of 64.”
FY2015-2017
graduation rates are based on an institution-level measurement of the cohort
rate, while FY2018 (and subsequent) rates are based on a statewide reporting
model. The BOR systemic graduation rate report is designed to track a
first-time, full-time cohort of students through the first six years of
Louisiana public post-secondary education, whether or not the student changed
institution.
Graduation rates
for UL Lafayette were reported to LAPAS for FY2015, FY2016, FY2017, and FY2018.
For FY2015-2017 the objective was to “increase the Graduation Rate (defined and
reported in the National Center of Education
Statistics Graduation Rate Survey) baseline year rate (Fall 2002 cohort) of 40.18% to 50% by 2018-19
(Fall 2011 cohort).” For FY2018, the objective was to “increase the
institutional statewide graduation rate (defined as a student completing an
award within 150% of ‘normal time’) from the baseline rate (Fall 2008 cohort
for all institutions) of 54% to 54.5% by AY2019-2020 (fall 2013 cohort).” The
graduation rates were as follows: FY2015, 45% graduation rate for the 2007
cohort; FY2016, 48.4% graduation rate for 2008 cohort; FY2017, 45.4% graduation
rate for 2009 cohort; and FY2018, 50.73% graduation rate for 2011 cohort. The
2011 cohort was used to calculate FY2018 rates according to instructions from
the BOR for graduation rate calculations based on their new tracking
methodology, which takes into account all students who have completed a
credential at any state public institution.
The Strategic Plan 2015-2020 goal of increasing the number of doctoral degrees awarded
to students by 10 has been met during each academic year. These numbers are
represented in Table 8.1 – 3.
Table 8.1 – 3: Doctoral Completer
Goals and Results 2015-2019
Year |
Doctoral
Completers |
Breakdown
by Degree |
Actual
+/- |
Goal |
Met/Not
met |
2014-2015 |
48 |
37 PhD, 9 EdD, and
2 DNP |
Baseline |
|
|
2015-2016 |
66 |
43 PhD, 12 EdD, and 11 DNP |
+18 |
+5 |
Met |
2016-2017 |
63 |
46 PhD, 19 EdD, and 0
DNP |
+15 |
+7 |
Met |
2017-2018 |
62 |
48 PhD, 13 EdD, and 1
DNP |
+14 |
+10 |
Met |
2018-2019 |
65 |
46 PhD, 17 EdD, and 2
DNP |
+17 |
+15 |
Met |
According to the Undergraduate Senior Exit Survey
Report (2017-2018),
74.1% of respondents indicated their post-graduation plan to be employed
full-time or part-time immediately after graduation, while 22.3% planned to
attend graduate or professional school full-time or part-time. The remaining
respondents (3.6%) indicated an intention to either pursue additional
coursework, serve in the military, start or raise a family, or volunteer.
Additionally, several academic programs administered exit surveys to their
graduating seniors:
·
Accounting Graduate Survey Data
·
Nursing Graduate
Survey Data
As mandated by
licensing boards, students complete licensure examinations in the following disciplines:
Accounting, Architecture, Athletic Training, Curriculum and Instruction,
Dietetics (now discontinued), Health Information Management, Nursing, and
Speech Language Pathology. The University expects that students completing licensure
examinations for their disciplines will meet or exceed the national average
pass rate.
The BOR is the
official reporting entity for program accreditation information, designating
different accreditations as “mandated, recommended, optional, or not applicable.”
The University has a total of 115 approved academic programs at the
undergraduate and graduate levels. Of the Bachelor-level programs/options
eligible for professional accreditation, 34 of 35 programs are accredited. Of
the 36 graduate-level programs eligible for professional accreditation, 31 of
the programs are accredited.
The Louisiana BOR Program Accreditation Summary for UL Lafayette, dated April 14, 2019, provides the
following data on the University’s degree programs:
·
53 Active Bachelor’s Degree Programs
·
35 Programs/Options Eligible for Professional Accreditation
·
34 Eligible Programs/Options which are Accredited
·
97.1% of Accreditable Programs/Options that are Accredited
·
24 Programs/Options Mandated by the BOR for Professional
Accreditation
·
24 Mandated Programs/Options that are Accredited
·
100% of Mandated Programs/Options that are Accredited
·
62 Active Graduate-level Certificates and Degree Programs
·
36 Programs/Options Eligible for Professional Accreditation
·
31 Eligible Programs/Options that are Accredited
·
86.1% of Accreditable Programs/Options that are Accredited
·
30 Programs/Options Mandated by the BOR for Professional
Accreditation
·
27 Mandated Programs/Options that are Accredited
·
90% of Mandated Programs/Options that are Accredited
Students in some
academic departments participate in a portfolio process as a means of
documenting outcomes for student achievement. Each program requiring a student
portfolio establishes the criteria for success and assesses individual
portfolios against these expectations (generally rubrics).
The Master of
Science in Nursing program uses Typhon Group’s NPST
Student Tracking System, which functions as a secure electronic student
tracking system that includes comprehensive clinical logs and reports. Faculty
using the system assess and evaluate the quality of the portfolios, and monitor
the progress of each student’s clinical experiences, to ensure that course
objectives are met.
In the Architecture Studies program, the purpose of the portfolio review is to ensure that students
have the necessary skills and knowledge after the foundation design sequence to
complete the program and enter the competitive fields of architecture,
industrial design, and interior design. A review committee evaluates each
student's portfolio to evaluate the student’s mastery of the material covered
within the first two-year design sequence, with additional consideration given
to overall academic and studio performance.
Advertising,
Journalism, Broadcasting, and Public Relations students in the department of
Communication submit student portfolios as part of the capstone course.
Working professionals serving on advisory boards in each concentration assess
advertising, broadcasting, and public relations portfolios every semester, and
journalism portfolios every Spring semester, using rubrics developed by the
department, following the recommendations of the Accrediting Council on
Education in Journalism and Mass Communication. The professionals' feedback on
portfolios is used to further effect curriculum changes, as needed, and
feedback is also shared with the students so they can improve their portfolios
before entering the job market.
UL Lafayette
conducts the NSSE every even year. While an indirect measure, the NSSE helps to
gauge student perceptions. Through this assessment of students in 2016 and 2018, the top five perceived gains among
seniors reflected the mission of the University’s General
Education core. Table 8.1 – 4
shows NSSE results for 2016 and 2018.
Table 8.1 – 4: UL Lafayette NSSE Results
2016 & 2018
NSSE
prompt |
Percentage
of Seniors Responding “Very
Much” or “Quite a Bit” |
|
Perceived Gains |
2016 NSSE |
2018 NSSE |
Thinking Critically |
85% |
81% |
Writing Clearly & Effectively |
72% |
70% |
Working effectively w/ others |
70% |
68% |
Acquiring job- or work-related knowledge & skills |
69% |
64% |
Analyzing numerical & statistical information |
66% |
66% |
Through these multiple measures, UL Lafayette consistently
identifies, evaluates, and publishes goals and outcomes for student achievement
appropriate to its mission, and to the nature of its students and its programs.
Accounting Graduate Survey Data
Architecture Design Requirements
BOR Program Accreditation Summary for
UL Lafayette
Communication Portfolio Rubrics
National Center of Education Statistics Graduation Rate Survey
Strategic Plan 2015-2020: Enrollment
Goals